so this app will be helpful

What is Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM)?

Gartner defines Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) as, “a set of business capabilities, processes, and supporting portfolio management technology.”1 The primary focus of SPM is to align each portfolio with the organization’s strategic objectives, ensuring that resources are allocated to initiatives that best support its overall mission and goals. It is also referred to as, “value-driven decision-making.”

Key Benefits of Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM)

The advantages of Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) can be summarized as:

Banner with words: Not just doing things right, but doing the right things.

Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) Supports Value

SPM benefits organizations by ensuring that all work is measured against other investments and organizational strategies. This strategic focus on value helps organizations make the most of their resources to benefit customers and stakeholders.

Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) Empowers Agility

SPM enhances organizational agility by enabling quick resource pivots to new opportunities as market needs change. By aligning projects with strategic goals, SPM ensures swift responses to market shifts, efficient resource allocation, and sustained competitiveness. This flexibility allows companies to adapt and thrive in a dynamic business environment.

Misallocated Funds Due to Missing Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM)

In this real-life example, let’s see how Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) works as an essential framework that helps executives link work to value and strategy, and the misguided decisions that can happen without SPM.

Imagine you live in a mid-sized city of 65,000 people. Your city council recently approved spending $62,000,000 to build two hockey arenas. The proposal’s business case demonstrated that the planned hockey tournaments per year would financially benefit local hotels, restaurants, and gas stations. Independently, the math looked good.

However – consider the bigger picture:

  • Only about 2% of the city’s population is involved in hockey.
  • The local businesses that will benefit account for about 0.05% of the city’s total businesses.
  • $62,000,000 is equivalent to approximately 15 years of the city’s total recreational budget.
  • These funds are provided through public taxation.

The approval of this project failed to apply the Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) framework and consider the overall investments, assets, and needs of the community. Crucial big-picture questions were not addressed:

  • Does this project support our overall goals, values, and strategies?

  • Can this project pivot to support other value propositions?

 

As a result:

  • 98% of the population is paying for a facility they will never use.
  • The majority of the city’s businesses will not benefit financially.
  • Allocating the budget in this way does not leave funding for other recreational interests, such as racquet sports, indoor soccer facilities, splash pads, or pickleball (the fastest growing sport in the world)!

 What if the city had taken a Strategic Portfolio Management approach?

The city council would evaluate the merits of the proposed project against essential SPM considerations.

City council members would ask: Will this project align with our city’s value of benefiting all citizens?

  • Answer: No.
    • Although the project may fit a portion of the city’s recreation goals, it would be apparent that only a tiny portion of the population would benefit, and therefore not a good fit for the universal value of the city.

The city council members would ask: Can this product pivot to support other valued initiatives?

  • Answer: No.
    • Locking funds into a 15-year project for single sport facilities does not allow adaptability of the city funds or resources.

As a result of following the Strategic Portfolio Management approach…

  • This project would not have been approved as is.
    • Funds would not be locked up for 15 years of tax obligation.
  • If contested, the city council can justify the decision, citing alignment with the city’s values and strategies, as well as the need for adaptability.
  • The projects/products that are approved will align to the city’s values and strategies, resulting in greater overall satisfaction.
    • For example, other projects could be considered, such as approving one $20 million hockey arena, if it could secure state or federal funding. With the remaining budget, additional ventures could be considered.
      • Many more members of the population could enjoy the city’s recreational amenities.
      • The facilities could be used more frequently for a variety of purposes.
      • Additional businesses would benefit, as the facilities could be spread out through the community, and a variety of activities draws a more diverse population of consumers.
  • If the goals, values, and strategies of the city shifted, resources could be available to meet the community’s needs.

Even if you’re a die-hard hockey fan, we’re certain you can see the benefits of alignment with strategic goals, enhanced decision-making, and long-term value creation. After all, Herb Brooks would remind us, “Great moments are born from great opportunity.” SPM is a great opportunity.

Key components of Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM):

Portfolio Assessment

  • Apply strategic methods to evaluate the current portfolio.
  • Identify strategic fit and value contribution of existing projects/products.

Resource Management

  • Effectively allocate and utilize resources.
  • Balance resource supply with strategic demand.

Risk Management

  • Identify, assess, and mitigate risks at the portfolio level.
  • Deploy techniques to manage uncertainty and volatility.

Strategic Roadmapping

  • Develop and maintain a strategic roadmap.
  • Align project/products and programs with long-term business objectives.

Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) Critical Questions:

SPM guides all members of an organization to ask essential holistic questions. The answers to these questions guide executive leaders to prioritize the right initiatives at the right time.

  • Do we have the right skills and resources (financial, human, etc.) to achieve our strategic goals?
  • Is the work in our portfolio significant enough to impact our strategic goals positively?
  • Are we continuously innovating and renewing our portfolio to stay competitive and relevant in the market?
  • Are we efficiently utilizing our resources to maximize the return on the investment?

How is Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) different than Project Portfolio Management (PPM)?

Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) expands beyond traditional Project Portfolio Management (PPM) by managing all types of work (projects, products, services, etc.) and ensuring the work continually links back to organizational value and strategy.

In the hockey facilities example above, the approved proposal for the hockey arenas may have been considered a Project Portfolio Management success, as the sole focus was on one project. However, Strategic Portfolio Management includes a more comprehensive scope. Strategic Portfolio Management is the evolutionary progression of Project Portfolio Management.

To illustrate this, the following graphic depicts the Strategic Portfolio Management hierarchy. Only the bottom two tiers of the pyramid are included in Project Portfolio Management.

Strategic Planning Frameworks

Strategic Planning Frameworks graphic. A pyramid with horizontal sections. On the left side of the pyramid, an arrow points up, with the text, "Progressive Adaption/Change Management." From the top down, there are three strategic levels: 1. Strategic Direction. 2. Strategic Alignment. 3. Strategic Execution. Strategic Direction is at the top of the pyramid. An icon of a compass is next to the "Strategic Direction (Executive Team)" text. Strategic Direction includes five descending categories: Values. Mission. Vision. Strategic Imperatives. Strategic Goals. Strategic Alignment is the below Strategic Direction on the pyramid. An icon of a stack of papers is next to the text, "Strategic Alignment (SRO)." Strategic Alignment includes one or two descending categories: Strategic Initiatives (Programs and Projects). Portfolio Management (This can also fit under Strategic Execution). Strategic Execution is the lowest section of the pyramid. An icon of an arrow in the center of a target is next to the text, "Strategic Execution (SRO+)" Strategic Execution includes one or two descending categories: Portfolio Management (This can also fit under Strategic Alignment). Project Execution. Caption below pyramid reads: Sanchez, David, and Jenn Tadros. "Build a One-Page Plan to Transform Your Strategy Into Results (Session 229). "Conference Presentation at PMI Global Summit 2023, Atlanta, Georgia, October 26, 2023.

The new taxonomies in this graphic were introduced at the Gartner IT Symposium 2023, and PMI Global Summit 2023. A standardization of an industry-accepted taxonomy for strategic planning is in the works. Currently, there is still some variability at the top of the pyramid, regarding the taxonomy of value, vision, and mission. The remaining classifications are predominately standard.

From the top to the base of the pyramid, there are three strategic levels of progressive adaptation/change management: Direction, Alignment, and Execution.

1. Strategic Direction. Governance is lead by the Executive Team.

  • Values
  • Mission
  • Vision
  • Strategic Imperatives
  • Strategic Goals

2. Strategic Alignment. Rego experts have observed a trend in the governance of this framework. Governance is shifting from the Project Management Office (PMO) to the Strategic Realization Office (SRO).

  • Strategic Initiatives (Programs and Projects)
  • Portfolio Management (This can also fit under Strategic Execution)

3. Strategic Execution. Rego experts have observed a trend in the governance of this framework. Governance is shifting from the Project Management Office (PMO) to the Strategic Realization Office (SRO).

  • Portfolio Management (This can also fit under Strategic Alignment)
  • Project Execution

As value-driven decision-making and SPM adoption increase, Rego anticipates the injection of this value alignment and measurement at the execution level. This trend is already driving a shift in how this space is referred to in general: as Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM), not Project Portfolio Management (PPM).

Differences between a Strategic Realization Office (SRO) and a Project Management Office (PMO)

There is often confusion between Strategic Realization Office (SRO) and Project Management Office (PMO) roles and responsibilities. They both add value to strategic management, but there are important differences.

The Strategic Realization Office

  • The Strategic Realization Office (SRO) emphasizes implementing the right projects and evaluating whether they serve the organization’s strategic alignment needs.

Executive leadership implements the SRO to better understand the enterprise strategy.

The Project Management Office

  • The Project Management Office (PMO) focuses on implementing projects properly and efficiently, supporting project managers in sharing resources, as well as best practices, coaching, and monitoring compliance with project and process standards.

The PMO is responsible for executing the strategies that are assigned by the SRO.

Why Does Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) Matter Now?

The increased utilization of Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) has been gaining momentum over the past few years. What is prompting SPM to be a priority?

SPM is essential for competing in the current marketplace for three reasons:
Maturity. Agility. Risk.

Maturation and Need for Continuous Planning graphic. Venn diagram showing three intersecting circles with SPM in the center. The three circles contain the following text: 1. Maturity: Maturity in strategy and alignment enable continuous investment prioritization. 2. Risk: Continuous planning as a tool for speed and safety in organizational goal pursuit. 3. Agility: Necessary due to a rapidly changing business environment and competitive pressures.

Maturity

The movement towards value-driven decision-making and Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) is fueled by increasing organizational maturity. As organizations advance, they improve by aligning their work with strategic goals and translating company visions into measurable business objectives. This is often accomplished by utilizing OKRs (Objectives and Key Results).

The Strategic Portfolio Management framework empowers organizations to make decisions closely aligned with their overarching strategy. This heightened maturity in strategic planning practices ensures that strategy permeates every level of execution and decision-making. This ultimately drives the organization towards its long-term goals with greater precision and effectiveness.

Agility

Business agility has long been a key factor in successful organizations, but in today’s rapidly evolving business environment, it is more important than ever. Companies must pivot and leverage resources swiftly to respond to industry shifts and unforeseen challenges. For example, the COVID-19 pandemic underscored the critical need for organizations to react quickly and adapt their strategies to overcome challenges.

SPM is versatile and not bound to any single method of working, such as agile or waterfall. This flexibility enables organizations to manage their continuous planning using various approaches, adapting as needed to maintain strategic alignment and operational efficiency.

Risk

Risk is emerging as a significant driver for adoption of Strategic Portfolio Management and value-driven decision-making. Organizations are increasingly accepting risk, recognizing the necessity to pivot quickly and deliver results rapidly. By embedding strategy all the way down to the execution level, companies can embrace more risk while maintaining “guardrails” to ensure work remains aligned with strategic priorities. This flexibility allows for greater risk-taking since projects can be adjusted or redirected swiftly if their strategic value changes.

Additionally, Strategic Portfolio Management can mitigate risk for organizations, by enabling the evaluation of a wide range of investments—not just projects. This includes business capabilities, programs, digital and physical products, applications, and more. Each can be assessed against the organization’s values, ensuring comprehensive alignment with strategic goals.

How to Get Started with Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM)

Before implementing Strategic Portfolio Management, follow these guidelines.

Get Executive Buy-in

Assess the perspectives of executives regarding Objectives and Key Results (OKRs). Focus on strengthening organizational alignment and obtaining executive-level endorsement for value-based decision-making.

Understand Strategy and Value

Ensure there is a clear definition of top-level strategy and value within your organization. Engage with leadership to gain a comprehensive understanding, enabling you to effectively apply these values in work execution.

Plan for the Future

Consider evolving your Portfolio Management Office (PMO) by establishing an Strategy Realization Office (SRO) as part of your executive leadership team to achieve better strategic alignment and to guide the PMO with prioritization.

Evolution of Value-Driven Decision-Making

Evolution of Value-Driven Decision-Making graphic. Three text sections and two lines surrounding the text and leading to the next section. The first section has an icon of a sign post. The text says, "Shift from defining to actively using value for decision-making." The second section has an icon of a dollar sign with two circular arrow lines surrounding it. The text says, "Questions on regular 'what-if'' planning and resource allocation based on investment value. The third section has an icon of a magnifying glass over a document. The text says, "Transition to continuous scenario planning for real-time value evaluation."

What Tools Support Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM)?

The Gartner Magic Quadrant for Strategic Portfolio Management is a comprehensive report that evaluates and ranks vendors within the Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM) market based on their completeness of vision and ability to execute.

In 2024, Clarity (Broadcom) ranks as a strong “Leader,” the best category for “Ability to Execute,” and “Completeness of Vision.”

Gartner clients can access the full report here.

Get Help with Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM)

If you are interested in implementing SPM in your organization, contact Rego today.

Rego Consulting’s team of experts have successfully guided many organizations with Strategic Portfolio Management implementations. We would gladly put our expertise to work for you.

Additional Resources

In your quest to understand Strategic Portfolio Management, we recommend the following resources:

Image of sunset and the silhouettes of three people ascending a steep rock summit. The top two people are assisting the third person to climb up.

About the Author: Rego Consulting

As the leading Strategic Portfolio Management (SPM), Project Portfolio Management (PPM), Technology Business Management (TBM), Agile and expert services provider, Rego Consulting has helped hundreds of organizations achieve a higher return on their software investment, including 60% of Fortune 100 and 70% of Fortune 20 companies.